This is a great game. It is a very well made game just like WC3 and I like how they have improved on it since the last world conqueror game. I would like greater diplomacy and be able to play neutral countries during eras like 1939 and choose which side you want to join. It is a bit hard to play for me and well I tried to cheat and get medals and it didnt work. Purpose was to make it funner to play like if i played as the USA I would only use American generals. Anyways it is a very good game and I recomend other people to play this game. Great job Easytech. 100/10.
Initially I was overjoyed when this game finally became available on android because I love the world conqueror series but it doesn't live up to it's potential. there are a lot of cons rather then pros but I feel the most important con is no multiplayer. I had hopes that their would be multiplayer because it would be fun to play a campaign mission or a conquest with another person on your side rather than the ai. Also it kinda sucks that my I have to buy zukov, manstien and Eisenhower again I bought them in wc3 and I don't think I want to have to buy them again
The gameplay is nice, love the way you can build new buildings, makes traveling between europe and asia much easier. Only thing i hate is how hard it is to get medals. Its also impossible to get good or even decent generals and the upgrades shouldn't take so much effort to earn considering how the ai is way more tougher in this than any other WC game you made.
A great step forward with the World Counqering franchise. Definitely more challenging then WC3. I love how they've kept all the great features of WC3 and added more generals/skills and now individual upgrades per units. Conquest is harder without the cheats of wonders in WC3 but that makes you use more skill. As with everyone else I wish you had more diplomatic abilities. Either asking other countries for money/ or help. Or being able to play as nuetral countries and pick a side. As well as wishing you could play as more countries. Can't wait for the next WC. Hoping it'll either be a throw back to WWI or a more in-depth WWII one as with the old glory of generals. Would love to see a modern 21st century conquest
I would like to play a neutral country like sweden or Switzerland. I would also like more in depth diplomatic. Aloso I think the conquest mode should determine if you get to unlock the next era. The technology levels are to hard to get, if you are a smaller country like spain or Romania it impossible to improve cities. But in general the had a good foundation but it just needs to be built on
Really enjoy the game, have played all conquers by easy tech but I have to agree with most folks saying medals are required to win. In 3 you at least got 1 free general, and I made do with a couple shoddy early generals in WC3. Bronze generals cost as much as GOOD generals in WC3. Ya'll need to lower medal price for a good deal of generals. Middle tier bronze is 1200 medals. 7$ for 2800 medals... give us a break please
The most frustrating game ive ever played. To make any progress you need months. The skill upgrades cost a lot. And the only difference between this game and the last one is really just the visuals of it. There is nothing new. Maybe some units but thats all there is. This is just a copy and paste of the last game and thats it. Eesytech looks like you dont really care about making a good game
It would be a lot better if instead of having to complete the Scenario for each conquest map you should change it to how it was in WC3 when you unlcocked the maps the more you play. PLEASE CHANGE, very disappointed, waste of money because of this. And if you can't change this at least make the Scenario levels easier. (Please reply)
I have been playing World Conqueror 3 for a long time and WC3 has managed to give me satisfaction with simple but fun gameplay. And this impression I get when playing World Conqeueror 4, with gameplay like WC3 but there are additional buildings, weapons and others. However, I realized to get a medal in this game is quite difficult and even can be said very difficult, I frankly disappointed about it. But, I'm sure .. a great game producer like Easy Teach will fix this for the sake of consumer pleasure????
The. Controls are simple and intuitive with good graphics and in depth gameplay. The diplomacy is good because you can declare war on anyone who is neutral. I don't like the general system because you can't train your own anymore, and the generals are somewhat expensive. Also you still cannot heal ships. Please fix this. I love your games but you abandon all of your projects.
I really love your game but I think it suffers from the same problems as the last one. I believe that the game is pay to win and it doesn't seem like the diplomacy feature works too well as when I give my allies money they waste it and don't even help. Axis scenario 5 is really hard to do without an overpowered general. Apart from some other flaws it's a great game. I would love if you could make World Conquerer V like hearts of iron IV and make the map bigger.
I liked the previous one more. The maps are a lot more difficult and you don't get free generals during hq 5,8,10 or whatever. The medals req are more expensive and grinding a stage be it 1 or 10 all reveals the same crappy rewards
I love how hard the game is now compared to the last one, but I still have one large problem MULIPLAYER. I was really hoping and expecting it to be in here with the amount of people I've seen ask for it. I also heard rumors from my find that you do plan on adding it. I hope he is right. Love and game and still hope for multilayer.
The game itself is incredibly difficult if you are the axis on conquest, last I checked the poles and Russians didn't fight the nazis together. Its incredibly hard to fight as Nazi Germany as yiu are always fighting so many at once so if you do take most of europe the soviets just wreck you with 1 tank division
The game is super hard and unfair at times. I loved the last game and it was hard at times too, but this is just frustrating and not fun to play. I like everything else though. The new land taking system is a bit odd but it doesn't bother me too much. If you make the game easier then I'll give you more stars.
The game was great but there is one problem.. It is that i still need to connect to Google Play Games everytime i open the game.. We do not have WiFi connection so i can only play the game only if i am online... Pls fix the Sign In problem for us and please reply.. Thanks
Longtime fan of the previous World Conquerer. I waited what seemed like forever for this game to come out and it was worth it. I usually don't buy Android games but I made an exception for this due to the low price. My only complaint is the low amount of medals received for doing stuff in the game. I would gladly pay more for the base game if the microtransactions were cut back a bit. Also, I really wish the custom generals from World Conquerer 3 weren't removed which makes medals even more necessary.
I have always been a fan of World Conqeuror! and I would say this game is great! Also, are you planning on adding the changing sides diplomacy option? like Russia joining the axis or Germany joining the allies?
I love it to pieces. Best one yet. Love everything about it and I finally beat the 1939 conquest. But the 1943 was not unlocked. Is this something that was changed from the previous one? Or am I experiencing a bug of some sort? Other than that issue, it is a very great game.
I want a local multiplayer conquest like Bluetooth connection multiplayer or online also the game is pretty challenging and I want to have a custom general thing like in the third world conqueror. But it is a great game. :) also maybe make it so you can pick a country and pick what side your on.
After a few weeks I see conquest mode is way more difficult. This is a much slower progressing game now. Generals and technology are needed before starting a conquest. More strategy is involved and more emphasis on becoming a world economic power to win the war. As your level increases in the conquest you gain power and abilities. *** MAJOR GLITCH in conquest mode, now ports and cites need to be occupied before a country will be defeated. In WC3 it was only cities and now the same importance in given to a port as a city? *** With the AI strength issue, lowering the inital troop level and not allowing AI to use multiple formations will help. Please correct in future update.
I've been playing since WC3 so when i found out this game came iut i got exited. The gameplay is solid better mechanics, but im alittle disappointed that you can't create your own super general like in the third game. But other than that it's still a fun game
I love the game but it's sad that the AI is always so dumb whenever it's on your team, like you can play as Bulgaria and the Axis gets smashed while if you play as someone like Canada or Australia and you try your hardest the Allies still get utterly crushed. A great thing to add would be multilayer too
As always, EasyTech never fails to amaze me. While the wait for WC4 to release on Google Play was tiresome, I was able to demo the game by playing the Chinese release of it. It has all of the elements of EW3, EW4 and WC3 wrapped into a greatly addicting time killer. By far, my favorite EasyTech game out of the series, and I cannot wait to see what else EasyTech has in store for WC4 in the future.
I love this game and i want to play it more but the AI are overpowered and have the ultimate advantage in conquest mode. If you want to win, you have to spend more money on medals and generals. Another play to win money grab. Im so disappointed
I have to pay for this game so I expected it to be a complete experience. Nope! You have to pay a lot more to make any different. Stay away from it.
After a masterpiece with WC3 I have to admit WC4 is too much complicated and difficult, enemies are brilliant, they play like aliens in WC3...have to admit that you plan to get rich on this game cause without spending extra money this seems very very very difficult game. Great work guys :-).
Definitely an update to WC3 graphics and general gameplay, research and upgrade system is awesome and feels more in depth like you can specialise more! love the new domination stuff shame it takes so long to lvl my HQ, miss custom Generals tho please bring it back. With all that being said it still feels like you have to buy medals to progress even more so to be honest than WC3 but i have progressed slowly without spending so far. All in all its worth the 79p it cost to buy the game. Will edit my review whenever EasyTech Add or change stuff.
1/Reinstall the game if it crashes on you. 2/Google ”World Conqueror 4 forum" to read up on the best WC4 Generals, most efficient conquests, what skills to upgrade, and all of the best strategies for the game!
Easytech has completely screwed the release of this game on play store. I hate to give th6em even a dime of my money! Connection error! Update: works 4star!
Edit: Okay, after some days of gaming, I found that the game is really difficult like what the other players are saying. Im so disappointed, this is not like the WC3 where your skills can make you win. Previously I commented: Hi Easytech! Greetings from the Philippines! I have been your fan since Conqueror 2, so when I heard that the Conqueror 4 is already out, I never thought twice on buying the game. More power to you guys! I hope you listen to your fans and get a hint on things that needs improvement. Overall, even though I didn't played WC4 yet, I might say, you've done a great job.
You need skill, and time to build up, or a lot of money. Generals are expensive, needs the free generals like wc3. Great gameplay, fun to play with, but i would love to be able to play as a neutral country.
Seriously pissed. . .enterd the app one day and all my data reset, halfway through the campain, all my earned medals and generals gone.
I love this game and have been waiting so long for it. The only thing is I want to surrender and declare war on my opponents. Please add that in! Thanks so much????
It is great game but in app purchases ruins it. You can't progress without it. It really ruins gameplay and devs please if you are doing games so hard to progress at least let us complete it for year and don't release another one or just make it easier to progress.
As much as I like it since it is one of the only good "strategy" games, there are some flaws. The biggest being no matter the year you play in, it's all the combatants are there from the beginning. If you play 1939, Russia and American shouldn't already be in the war. Second there really is no strategy involved, just bum rush the enemy with more units and you'll win. If the make it so the diplomacy is more in depth so that 1939 had a more realistic start I'll up the amount of stars.
Why mission in Cold War scenario so hard..? But i like all of it. Good job
I was a huge fan of wc3 most of the things that I didn't like in wc3 we're changed. I just wish there would be more maps and more diplomacy not counting that the game is great
Great game held back by many flaws. I have been playing since WC2, and the game has come a long way yet fails to implement key in game features. Firstly, strongly disappointed that to play the game you have to have an internet connection yet ironically there is no multiplayer. Secondly, as a paid game I would expect there to be no in game pay to win yet there is. It's still ridiculously hard to amass in game medals without purchase and makes collecting all the generals impossible without investing an insane amount of time in the game. This series is a staple in startegy on mobile yet is being held back by poor decisions. If this game were to make medals a lot more easier to collect I would give it a 5. Also, in game text makes no sense, the grammar is so off, could've hired a translator.
The game is great but the medals you get for finsihing a campagin is way to low like the general cost way to much. To be honest your guys did great making all the 4 world conquer games keep doing what you guys doing :-).